DRCNetDrug Reform Coordination Network


Help F.E.A.R. Support Forfeiture Reform

F.E.A.R. (Forfeiture Endangers American Rights) is working for reform of state and federal forfeiture laws. There are currently two bills in the House of Representatives that address this issue, H.R. 2417, submitted by Representative Henry Hyde of Illinois, a republican, and H.R. 3347, submitted by Representative John Conyers of Michigan, a democrat. You can receive information and a complementary copy of F.E.A.R's newsletter by contacting F.E.A.R. - email, phone, fax, and snailmail information listed below. Include your name, address, and congressman or congressional district if you know it, and John Paff will send you back a laser-printed letter addressed from you to your representative in support of H.R. 2417 and H.R. 3347. The following is a brief article describing F.E.A.R. and the need for forfeiture reform:

F.E.A.R. (Forfeiture Endangers American Rights)

P.O. Box 5424
Somerset, NJ 08875-5424
Phone: 908/873-1251
FAX: 908/873-2070
E-Mail: [email protected]

Forfeiture Reform Group Gaining Ground

by John Paff

Forfeiture Endangers American Rights (F.E.A.R.) is an organization dedicated to reforming state and federal forfeiture laws. If you're not convinced that forfeiture statutes are in need of reform, read the following quote from _United States v. One 1982 Chevrolet Corvette_ a forfeiture case decided in 1992 by the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (976 F.2d 392):

In a civil forfeiture proceeding, the Government must establish probable cause that the property was used or intended to be used for an unlawful purpose. The Government must show more than mere suspicion but less than prima facie proof, and it may use hearsay to establish probable cause. Once the government meets this burden, the burden shifts to the party opposing forfeiture to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that the property is not subject to forfeiture. (citations omitted)

In another case, _United States v. Sandini_ (816 F.2d 869) the Third Circuit Court of Appeals bluntly held that in a federal forfeiture action, "the innocence of the owner is irrelevant." Not surprisingly, police agencies around the country have been using these sweeping seizure powers to intimidate, harrass and abuse law-abiding citizens. The lure of forfeiture is causing widespread police corruption, causing Elvin Martinez, a Florida legislator who drafted that state's forfeiture law to remark "Our earnest expectation was that [Florida's state forfeiture law] would be used to specially target the criminal hierarchy that had so long evaded criminal sanctions. But before long, we began to see the operation of Lord Acton's famous axiom: that power 'tends to corrupt.' . . Those who lacked the capacity to fight back became the targets of opportunity in a system that seemed to lose sight of its original goal and began to see forfeiture as a source of agency funding rather than a crime fighting tool." Prior to making the above statements, Martinez was awarded the "Crime Fighter of the Year" award by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement.

F.E.A.R. has helped get forfeiture reform legislation introduced in the Congress (H.R. 3347 and H.R. 2417) and has spearheaded similar efforts in state legislatures. Anybody who has any questions, comments or who would like a complimentary issue of our newsletter is invited to write to us at P.O. Box 5424, Somerset, NJ 08875-5424, or e-mail us at [email protected].

If you like what you see here and want to get these bulletins by e-mail, please fill out our quick signup form at http://www.drcnet.org/signup.html.

Click to sign up now

Return to Rapid-Response-Team Chronological Listing

Drug Reform Coordination Network